• No results found

Museum Discovery Centre

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Share "Museum Discovery Centre"

Copied!
20
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Milestone (AUST) Pty Limited Page 1

31 January 2020

Bronwyn Inglis

Acting Principal Forward Planner The Hills Shire Council

PO Box 7064 Norwest NSW 2153

Sent via email: [email protected] Dear Bronwyn

RE: PLANNING PROPOSAL NO. 5/2020/PLP - RESPONSE TO COUNCIL LETTER 2 GREEN ROAD, CASTLE HILL

We refer to the Planning Proposal lodged with The Hills Shire Council (Council) on 18 October 2019 for the abovementioned site and write in response to Council’s letter dated 19 December 2019 requesting the submission of additional information to assist Council Officers assessment of the Planning Proposal. This letter provides a response to the matters raised in your letter to enable Council Officers to report the Planning Proposal for consideration at The Hills Local Planning Panel Meeting on 19 February 2020.

Please find enclosed with this letter the following:

• Tree Replacement Strategy prepared by ASPECT Studios dated January 2020 (Attachment A).

• Heritage Review Statement prepared by Curio Projects dated January 2020 (Attachment B).

RESPONSE TO COUNCIL LETTER

Issue (a): Proposed Tree Removal and Replanting

1. An assessment is required against the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 and Environment Protection Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act)

Response

The Arborist Report prepared by Mackay Tree Management assessed the potential biodiversity significance of the existing plantation on the site and concludes:

“A ‘threatened species test of significance (former 7-part test)’ in accordance with the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016, is not required as part of the DA proposal or any future DA proposal. The proposed tree removals do not exceed the threshold for removal of native vegetation under the Biodiversity Offset Scheme.”

On this basis, any further assessment against the EPBC Act is not required and the submission of an additional or revised arborist report is not considered necessary.

2. Clarification regarding the planning mechanism to ensure replanting occurs on the TAFE site in accordance with a future Vegetation Management Plan and/or Landscape Plan

Response

The lodgement of the Development Application with Council for the construction of Building J with associated landscaping, and inclusion of the TAFE site as part of the development subject site, will be the

(2)

Milestone (AUST) Pty Limited Page 2

planning mechanism to ensure any replanting on the TAFE site occurs in accordance with any future Landscape Plan. Land Owners consent will be obtained from TAFE and submitted with any Development Application where replanting on the TAFE site is proposed.

3. Submission of a Concept Landscape Plan Response

A Tree Replacement Strategy prepared by ASPECT Studios is submitted with this letter (refer to Attachment A). The Tree Replacement Strategy confirms the commitment of the project to deliver a 2:1 ratio for tree replanting to provide a total of 674 trees on-site and off-site. The Site Plan at Appendix A of the Tree Replacement Strategy includes potential investigation areas for replacement tree planting. It is noted that the areas along the site frontage to Showground Road are generally heavily planted with mature trees and this part of the site requires close examination for replanting opportunities in addition to the other areas of the MDC and TAFE sites as part of the preparation for the future Building J Development Application.

The proposed tree replacement ratio of 2:1 exceeds the Council’s minimum requirement of an equal number of replacement trees (Section 3.2 in Part C Section 3 of The Hills Development Control Plan 2012 (DCP 2012)).

The proposed 2:1 replacement ratio also exceeds the NSW Government’s objective of a 40% Urban Tree Canopy increase as outlined in the Central City District Plan (a 100% canopy cover increase is proposed). The 2:1 replanting ratio has been selected to ensure MAAS, as a State Government agency, exceeds minimum canopy cover requirements to ensure significant positive environmental outcomes.

The design development of the building and site layout of the proposed Building J is currently ongoing and subject to feedback and input from the design consultant team and MAAS which is resulting in further refinement and changes to the building footprint. Therefore it is not considered appropriate to provide a concept landscape plan at this stage.

A Landscape Plan will be submitted as part of the future Development Application for the construction of the proposed Building J and this plan will provide detailed consideration to potential planting along the northern boundary of the site to provide some additional visual screening to Sunderland Avenue and in other locations of the MAAS MDC site, where practicable, subject to landscape architect and arborist advice.

We advise that Create Infrastructure, on behalf of MAAS, has commenced discussions with Landcom, Transport for NSW (formerly Roads and Maritime Services) and the Sydney Metro Authority regarding potential suitable locations for tree replanting off-site within The Hills Local Government Area.

4. Location of Car Parking on TAFE Site Response

Consideration of alternative car parking locations on the TAFE site will be undertaken as part of the preparation of the future Development Application with the aim to minimise the loss of any existing vegetation. Advice from the project arborist and landscape architect will be sought during consideration of any alternative locations.

TAFE does not object to the relocation of car parking within the TAFE site as outlined in the Planning Proposal. Further consultation on this matter will be undertaken with TAFE during preparation of the Development Application in conjunction with traffic consultant advice.

5. Potential Cultural or Heritage Values Response

A Heritage Review of the plantation trees in the location of the Building J site has been undertaken by heritage consultants Curio Projects (refer to Attachment B). The Heritage Review includes an analysis of the history of the use of the site and concludes that based on the information available “the eucalypt plantation has been deemed to have low significance” from a heritage perspective for the following key reasons:

• “The plantation is not significant in their own right to meet the threshold of significance at a local or State level.

(3)

Milestone (AUST) Pty Limited Page 3

• The plantation is not so significant at a local level that it would require insitu retention.

• The plantation also has no associations with any significant personnel at either a local or State level and therefore reinforces that the plantation holds no significance beyond the site itself.

• No heritage listings for the plantations or the research conducted from them on either a local or State level.”

MAAS is committed to preserve the removed trees where possible and will consider using timber from the removed trees for furniture reuse and/or interpretive displays as part of the redevelopment of the site.

Additionally, MAAS is supportive of the recommendation of Curio Projects that “archival recording before the removal of the trees could be conducted to retain information about the site” as part of the future Development Application for the proposed Building J.

Issue (B): Traffic and Car Parking

6. Submission of an Amended Traffic Report Response

The Traffic Report submitted with the Planning Proposal addresses the parking requirements of the proposed Building J for staff, volunteers and visitors. The submission of an amended report is not required in this instance.

7. Existing Parking Requirements Response

A Traffic and Parking Report will be prepared and submitted with the Development Application for the proposed Building J which will provide an analysis of the TAFE car parking requirements and may include recommendations regarding the existing provision of car parking on the TAFE site.

The Traffic Report prepared by Traffix for the TAFE DA 1674/2007/HA included the following commentary regarding the provision of 38 “informal” car parking spaces in the south western corner of the TAFE site:

Condition 2 of Development Consent No. 1674/2007/HA states the following:

Photo 1 indicates the informal parking area located in the south western corner of the TAFE site (within the southern end of the Planning Proposal site) has not been sealed by TAFE. Based on a review of documentation provided by Council via a Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (GIPA) Application submitted by Milestone, Council did not require the permanent sealing of the 22 of the 38 informal spaces given the low actual demand for these parking spaces since approval of DA No. 1674/2007/HA on 26 September 2007.

(4)

Milestone (AUST) Pty Limited Page 4

Photo 1: View of informal parking area (in 2017), view looking north from Showground Road

As outlined in the Traffic Report submitted with the Planning Proposal, it is expected that a proportion of staff and visitors to Building J will travel to and from the site using public transport. It is important to note that the public transport availability in the Castle Hill area has significantly improved since the preparation of the Traffix traffic and car parking report submitted with DA No. 1674/2007/HA in 2007. At the time of the DA lodgement in 2007 the North West Metro rail line, Point-to-Point transport operators such as Uber and On Demand bus services such as Hillsbus’ MetroConnect did not exist. On this basis, the provision of car parking specified in previous DAs for the TAFE and MDC sites would not reflect any reductions in car parking demand due to public transport infrastructure recently delivered in Castle Hill and surrounding suburbs.

TAFE did not raise any concerns with the proposed car parking relocation within the TAFE site following a review of the Planning Proposal before lodgement with Council.

8. Relocated Car Parking and Potential Impacts on Vehicle Movements on TAFE Site Response

We confirm that the vehicle access from Green Road across the TAFE site will be maintained. Access along the eastern side of the proposed Building J will also be maintained along a revised alignment to accommodate the new proposed building. The proposal will not diminish the existing level of vehicle access and movement within the TAFE site.

The Planning Proposal was reviewed in detail by TAFE prior to granting land owners consent and lodgement with Council. No objections were raised by TAFE in regards to the relocation of car parking spaces or in regards to vehicle movements within the TAFE site. Prior to lodgement of the Development Application with Council for the proposed Building J, MAAS will consult with TAFE regarding the location for relocated car parking.

9. Confirmation from TAFE Confirming Continuation of Existing Access and Overflow Parking Arrangement

Response

The Planning Proposal was reviewed in detail by TAFE prior to lodgement with Council and no issue was raised in relation to the ongoing use of the TAFE site by MAAS for overflow car parking and vehicle access via Green Road.

Prior to lodgement of the Development Application with Council for the proposed Building J, MAAS will liaise with, and seek owners consent from, TAFE which will include confirmation that the existing long standing arrangement of overflow car parking and vehicle access via Green Road by MAAS will continue.

(5)

Milestone (AUST) Pty Limited Page 5

Issue (C): Visual Impact, Built Form and Amenity

10. Submission of a Visual Impact Analysis, Photomontages, Elevations and External Finishes/Materials Response

The Planning Proposal report includes images depicting the extent of the proposed building envelope as viewed from the north of the site from Sunderland Avenue (refer to Figures 14 and 15 on Page 27). A larger version of Figure 15 is replicated below for clarity which shows the low height of the proposed 15m height envelope (shown as a dashed line).

Figure 1: Photo from Sunderland Avenue, view south looking towards the site showing the proposed building envelope (dashed lines). Note that the building will be located behind the existing tree canopies Source: Lahznimmo Architects, 2019, Figure 15 in Planning Proposal Report prepared by Milestone

Due to the ongoing design development of Building J the submission of a Visual Impact Analysis, Photomontages, Elevations and External Finishes/Materials will not be provided with the Planning Proposal as such information is likely to change and will not represent the final Development Application design submitted with Council. These documents will be provided with the Development Application for the proposed Building J. The external materials and finishes will give reference to Section 2.7 “Building Design and Materials” in Part B Section 6 of DCP 2012

As outlined in the Planning Proposal, the proposed Building J will have minimal visual impact when viewed from the residential area to the north of the site on consideration of the following key reasons:

Proposed building envelope

Existing MDC building outlines

(6)

Milestone (AUST) Pty Limited Page 6

• The proposed 15m building height control for the proposal will result in an infill building that will sit comfortably within the scale and heights of existing buildings on both the TAFE and MDC sites which range in height from 11.6m to 17m above ground level.

• The nearest residential properties to the north of Building J are located approximately 50m from the northern end of the proposed new building. The physical separation which includes an existing vegetated buffer ensures there is no visual bulk implications as a consequence of the proposal.

• The maximum height of the proposal is 15m which provides an appropriate height and scale transition to the maximum height permitted in the abutting R2 Low Density Residential Zoned area to the north of 10m.

• Existing vegetation will be maintained and provide visual screening (refer to Figure 1 above).

Opportunities for additional landscaping along the northern boundary of the TAFE site will be explored during the preparation of the Development Application.

11. Hours of Operation for Proposed Building J Response

The hours of operation for the proposed Building J will be confirmed as part of the Development Application, however, to assist with Council’s assessment of the Planning Proposal we advise that the following operating hours are envisaged by MAAS:

• The Collection Areas of the building will operate from 6.30am to 6.00pm Monday to Friday with occasional “out of hours” work for special operations such as deliveries and pick-ups for international exhibitions and Very Large Objects (VLO) transportation.

• Public access (e.g. small tours, researchers) will be made available from 10.00am to 5.00pm Wednesday to Sunday only.

Please contact the undersigned if you require any clarification of this matter.

Yours sincerely

Milestone (AUST) Pty Limited

Patrick Lebon Director

(7)

ATTACHMENT A

TREE REPLACEMENT STRATEGY PREPARED BY ASPECT STUDIOS DATED JANUARY 2020

(8)

TREE REPLACEMENT

STRATEGY

January 2020

Proposed Expansion of

Museum Discovery Centre

(9)

2

MUSEUM DISCOVERY CENTRE, CASTLE HILL

DOCUMENT CONTROL

V DATE DESCRIPTION BY REVIEW

1 28.01.2020 Draft 1 for review KB JK

2 29.01.2020 Draft 1 for review KB JK

3 30.01.202 FOR INFORMATION KB JK

© 2020

(10)

3

MUSEUM DISCOVERY CENTRE, CASTLE HILL

well as strategic planting along the frontage of Building J to ensure its facade is integrated into Showground Road and the landscape whilst also remaining highly visible for all visitors to the Museum. Additional planting along the Museum site boundary (Windsor and Showground Road) will be considered, but existing dense trees may limit opportunities and so alternatives off site will need to be considered. Tree removal & retention plan19107-LA-015 (appendix A) highlights possible investigation areas for replacement tree planting, with a future DA submission to detail all proposed on-site tree, understorey and mass planting (such as rain gardens).

• Other Locations within the LGA: Subject to further

discussions with Council and other land owners, suitable locations within the LGA will be identified, these may include Open Space, Parks, Reserves and Streets. Discussion between Council and Create NSW have already commenced.

3.3 Species

The most appropriate tree species will be specified based on numerous factors such as site suitability, functional and ecological attributes, aesthetic, and suitable landscape character.

Where possible, locally indigenous tree species should be planted. Within the Hills Shire this will include species such as Eucalyptus resinifera (Red Mahogany), Eucalyptus paniculate (Grey Ironbark) and Eucalyptus globoidea (White Stringybark). Species selection will be agreed with Council once replacement locations have been confirmed.

3.4 Size & Specification

MAAS is willing to plant a range of sizes up to mature tree stock of 400L, quantities will be subject to further discussions with council.

Quality nursery stock will be specified according to latest best practice and standards. All trees supplied should conform to the National Specification System of Australia (NATSPEC) guide “Specifying Trees – a guide to assessment of tree quality”.

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this document is to outline the Museum of Applied Arts & Sciences' (MAAS) approach and commitment to the replacement of any trees that would be removed, subject to the future Development Application, for the MAAS expansion at Museum Discovery Centre, 2 Green Road, Castle Hill (Lot 102 DP 1130271).

2.0 TREE REMOVAL

The proposal for Building J requires the removal of a total of 337 trees from the TAFE site. Tree removal & retention plan19107-LA-015 (appendix A) details this quantity and their location.

A detailed survey is required to determine the percentage of the site area canopy coverage that would be lost.

The Arborist Report prepared by MacKay Tree

Management identifies 330 of the 337 to be removed as plantation trees (planted in the 1940s). The tight spacing of these trees and their 'forest forms'- 'tall with narrow

spreading crowns that are concentrated towards the top of the trees' - means as a group they provide a mature

canopy but individually are less valuable.

3.0 MITIGATION STRATEGIES

3.1 Tree Replacement

The form and structure of the existing trees mean they are not suitable for to be transplanted and therefore this document and the Arborist Report prepared by MacKay Tree Management recommend the removed trees be offset by replacement planting.

MAAS would commit to a replacement ratio of 2:1 for any trees that are removed. This ratio aims to offset the loss of mature tree canopy loss. Therefore if 337 trees are proposed for removal by a future DA application, 674 replacement trees would be planted.

3.2 Locations

Replacement planting locations will include:

• On site; wherever feasible replacement planting

across the MAAS site will be proposed. A

commitment is made to tree and native understorey

planting to screen the relocated substation. As

(11)

4

MUSEUM DISCOVERY CENTRE, CASTLE HILL

3.5 Installation & Spacing

Standard technical specifications and installation

techniques will ensure successful establishment of newly planted trees.

New trees plantings should be spaced at densities appropriate to the selected tree species and proposed locations. For example, 7m centers spacing would be appropriate for the species outlined in 3.3 above.

4.0 CONCLUSION

At present any trees identified for removal are subject to a future Development Application. A DA submission will include landscape plans that detail all proposed on-site planting, however this document sets out MAAS' approach and commitment to replacement tree planting.

A large portion of replacement tree planting will need to

occur off-site which will be subject to further discussion

with Council during the DA process, working together to

identify suitable sites within the LGA.

(12)

Appendix

A Tree Retension and Removal Plan

(13)
(14)
(15)

ATTACHMENT B

HERITAGE REVIEW STATEMENT PREPARED BY CURIO PROJECTS DATED JANUARY 2020

(16)

Curio Projects Pty Ltd

Suite 9, 17 Thurlow Street, Redfern NSW 2016 ABN 7913918403

1 30 January 2020

Tania Alexander Create Infrastructure Level 3, 320 Pitt Street Sydney, NSW, 2000

Dear Tania,

RE: Assessment of Eucalypt Plantation for Museum Discovery Centre Expansion, Powerhouse Castle Hill

Thank you for asking Curio to provide some initial heritage advice to you on the expansion of the Powerhouse Museum Discovery Centre located at 172 Showground Road, Castle Hill.

Background

The Museum Discovery Centre (MDC) in Castle Hill (Lot 102 DP 1130271) is owned and operated by the Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences (MAAS) and is mainly used as a storage facility for museum collections from MAAS, Australian Museum and Sydney Living Museums, as well as being a public space for events and exhibitions. It consists of six buildings that are

predominantly used as storage spaces for collection, as well as open public areas for guided tours of the collections and both temporary and permanent exhibitions (Building E).1 The site for the proposed Building J is currently owned by TAFE NSW (Figure 1).

A new building (Building J), managed and designed by Create Infrastructure at Create NSW with Lahznimmo Architects is being proposed as a new facility to accommodate both MAAS and their Ultimo Powerhouse Museum’s collections, workshops, offices, production and conservation and treatment operations permanently. The proposed building will be located east of the MDC, on the western side of the existing TAFE site.2

1MDC Site History - MAAS

2 Planning Proposal, Proposed Expansion of Museum of Applied Art and Sciences – Museum Discovery Centre, 2 Green Road, Castle Hill (Lot 102 DP 1130271), prepared by Milestone, 2019

(17)

Curio Projects Pty Ltd

Suite 9, 17 Thurlow Street, Redfern NSW 2016 ABN 7913918403

2 Figure 1: TAFE site (green), MDC site (red), proposed Building J site (yellow)

(Source: SIX Maps)

Heritage Listing

When searching through the Office of Environment and Heritage Aboriginal Heritage Information Management System (AHIMS), it is revealed that there are no recorded or known locations of Aboriginal sites that are either within or around the subject area. Therefore, the proposed works at the subject site will have no significant impacts on any aboriginal heritage sites or places.

The nearest heritage item to the subject site is “Windsor Road from Baulkham Hills to Box Hill”, listed in Schedule 5 of LEP 2012 (No. I28), and is located approximately 115m south-west of the MDC. Hence, due to the distance between the subject site and the closest heritage item, no proposed works in the expansion of the MDC will impact upon the visual or physical settings of the heritage item.

(18)

Curio Projects Pty Ltd

Suite 9, 17 Thurlow Street, Redfern NSW 2016 ABN 7913918403

3

Historical Summary

The land on which the MDC and TAFE campus is situated on was utilised by MAAS in the 1940s, specifically to establish a variety of tree and shrub plantations for experimental research on essential oils. Thousands of seedlings, predominantly eucalyptus, were planted to determine which yielded the most oil and were therefore suitable for commercial plantations. This was a direct response to increased international competition from places like South Africa, Swaziland and Spain, that had established their own eucalyptus oil industries in the post-war period, using eucalypts grown from Australian seeds.3

During this time, the property included a still-house containing five stills for the distillation of oil from the leaves and a laboratory, a residence for the on-site manager, and a range of sheds and a glasshouse. Between 1978 and 2017, the construction of various buildings occurred as the museum’s collection grew and the need to facilitate the storage of these items and spaces for both the public and exhibitions. Research into essential oils continued until 1979 when a report issued by the NSW Science and Technological Council recommended that the research was undertaken by the Museum be transferred to the Department of Agriculture, as part of a wider rationalisation of all research being undertaken by NSW Government departments.

From research undertaken by the Museum in 1990, it appears that under the Public Works Act 1912, the Government acquired the land ‘for a public school’ in 1947. The Land Title to the whole Castle Hill property was initially held by the NSW Department of Education. The Land Title for a portion of the site (on which the MDC now sits) was transferred to the Museum on 27 April 1994, and the remainder was retained by the Department of Education.

Assessment of Significance

The tree and shrub plantations, specifically Stands A, B and C are not heritage listed nor have they been recognised on a local or state level as having heritage significance. Much of the original plantations and other natural landscape features have already been removed with the development of the TAFE campus and MDC expansion.

An evaluation of the plantations was conducted by Mackay Tree Management, in which they used a Significance of a Tree Assessment Rating System (STARS) to determine the potential significance of the plantations and their condition. Based on the arborist report, the Stand A plantation holds a low-medium significance due to the age of the White Cedar and Grey Gum trees (semi-mature). Stand B have low significance due to the unknown source of the Spotted Gum plantation stock, as well as the weak structure of the trees due to their close proximity to

3 https://collection.maas.museum/object/373318

(19)

Curio Projects Pty Ltd

Suite 9, 17 Thurlow Street, Redfern NSW 2016 ABN 7913918403

4 each other. Stand C also consists of a Spotted Gum plantation, and has low significance due to its poor condition, potentially from termite damage.4

Culturally, while the plantations were a response to researching which eucalyptus species yielded the most oil for commercial use, there is not a wide range of information on the results of this work.

Summary of Potential Issues Raised by Council

• Removal of trees in Stands A, B and C could impact on the landscape of the site and have environmental impacts

• The plantations and the research they were used for may have potential significance

Conclusions & Recommendations

Based on the analysis of the above information, the eucalypt plantation has been deemed to have low significance. The following summary has been prepared in response to the history and significance of the plantations in relation to the subject site to provide guidance concerning the removal of the plantations to accommodate the construction of Building J.

• Currently, there are no heritage listings for the plantations or the research conducted from them on either a local or State level.

• The plantation is not significant in its own right to meet the threshold of significance at a local or State level despite the commonality of the tree species (Corymbia maculate, Spotted Gum) within the local Cumberland Plain Woodland area. The physical conditions of the plantations themselves have also been deemed to have low significance overall due to their poor condition and semi-mature nature. This is in accordance with the STARS assessment criteria, where they specify the low significance for several reasons:

 Growth is severely restricted by above or below ground influences and is unlikely to reach typical dimensions under normal circumstances

 The tree is in good-poor condition and good-low vigour

 The tree is a young specimen which may or may not have reached dimension to be protected by local tree preservation orders or similar protection mechanisms

 The tree has a wound or defect that has the potential to become structurally unsound

• Historically, the eucalypt plantation is interesting, however, its history could be

interpreted throughout the redevelopment of the Building J site, as the plantation is not so significant at a local level that it would require insitu retention. The plantation also has no associations with any significant personnel at either a local or State level and

therefore reinforces that the plantation holds no significance beyond the site itself.

4 Arboricultural Impact Assessment Tree Survey, Museum of Applied Arts and Science, Museum Discovery Centre, Mackay Tree Management, prepared for Lahznimmo Architects, 2019

(20)

Curio Projects Pty Ltd

Suite 9, 17 Thurlow Street, Redfern NSW 2016 ABN 7913918403

5

• The plantation trees exhibit poor form and structure, and therefore will potentially cause safety and environmental issues down the track. As mentioned in the arboricultural report, the plantation does not represent the natural environment and is set in very dense grids that are unsustainable for the trees long term.

• The proposed trees to be removed do not exceed the threshold for removal of native vegetation under the Biodiversity Offset Scheme.

• Replacement plantings for the lost trees will be incorporated into the landscaping of the proposed construction with local indigenous eucalypt and shrub species to restore the landscape. By also incorporating ‘representative plantings’ to the landscaped areas, the site can hold some interpretive meaning, with the use of signage as a discussion point for the former history of the site. The removed trees can be used for furniture reuse and interpretive displays as part of the redevelopment of the site.

• The site has very little archaeological potential due to the extensive and intrusive tree root networks as a result of the dense plantation layout and already a very developed area in which the MDC is situated.

• A limited amount of information on the history of the site and the reasons for the research project are kept in the MAAS collections. It is suggested that further archival recording before the removal of the trees could be conducted to retain information about the site.

• There are numerous other examples of successfully established commercial eucalyptus oil plantations, such as:

 The predominant harvest areas for all Australian eucalypt oil production are in Bendigo, Victoria (since 1890) and West Wyalong in NSW (since the early 1900s), and are distributed by a variety of companies across Australia.

 Australian Eucalyptus Oil Company and is located in Arnold, Victoria. Their eucalypt farm has been successful for over 120 years.

 Western Australia established large-scale plantations for oil production and energy generation to reduce greenhouse gasses and soil salinity.

 All listed above use Australian Blue Mallee Eucalypts (Eucalyptus polybractea), unlike the MDC plantation, which used Spotted Gum (Corymbia maculate).

Should you have any further enquiries, please do not hesitate to contact me on either email:

[email protected] or tel: 0412737196.

Yours Sincerely,

Natalie Vinton Director

Curio Projects Pty Ltd.

References

Related documents

List of tables Table 1: Threatened and Priority Flora and Ecological Communities potentially occurring in the vicinity of the site 13 Table 2: Vegetation types 15 Table 3: