• No results found

Assessment of Consistency between the Relevant Biodiversity Measures of the Biodiversity Certification Order and Stage 1 of the Leppington Precinct

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Assessment of Consistency between the Relevant Biodiversity Measures of the Biodiversity Certification Order and Stage 1 of the Leppington Precinct "

Copied!
24
0
0

Full text

(1)

Report prepared by Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd Suite 204, Level 2, 62 Moore St, Austinmer 2515

Growth Centres Biodiversity Certification

Assessment of Consistency between the Relevant Biodiversity Measures of the Biodiversity Certification Order and Stage 1 of the Leppington Precinct

August 2015

(2)

was made by the Minister for the Environment under section 126G of the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (TSC Act).

In July 2008, the Minister’s certification was validated by the Threatened Species Conservation Amendment (Special Provisions) Act 2008 which was subsequently incorporated into Part 7 of Schedule 7 of the TSC Act. The amendment gives the Minister for the Environment the power to suspend or revoke the certification if any of its conditions, termed Relevant Biodiversity Measures (RBMs), are not complied with.

The RBMs applying to the certification have remained unaltered since gazettal of the original order and require (among other things) the permanent protection of 2000 hectares of high quality vegetation within the Growth Centres.

This report has been prepared to fulfil the requirement of RBM 35 for an assessment of the consistency of proposed precinct plans with the biodiversity certification and the RBMs.

This report has been prepared in a table format and addresses all RBMs that are relevant to precinct planning. It is noted that many of the RBMs are not specific to precinct planning and have therefore not been included in the report.

A complete copy of the relevant biodiversity measures can be found on the Office of Environment and Heritage’s website at http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/biocertification/notcert.htm

Where the report indicates that precinct planning is inconsistent with the biodiversity certification, full justification for the inconsistency is provided as part of the ecological assessment for the precinct.

This report only covers the future Leppington Precinct. This area was released by the NSW Government in November 2011.

All calculations of vegetation areas (extents) listed in Table 1 below refer only to the Leppington Precinct.

(3)

Additional High Conservation Value Vegetation (AHCVV) means areas of vegetation which were found during ground-truthing which would otherwise meet the definition of Existing Native Vegetation but was not originally identified as “vegetation” on maps 4 and 5 of the draft Growth Centres Conservation Plan.

Biodiversity Certification Maps means the maps marked “North West Growth Centre – Biodiversity Certification” and “South West Growth Centre – Biodiversity Certification” dated November 2007 and included in Schedule 2 of the Biodiversity Certification Order.

Certified Area means an area marked as a certified area on a biodiversity certification map.

Clearing of existing native vegetation means any one or more of the following:

a) cutting down, felling, thinning, logging or removing existing native vegetation in whole or in part,

b) killing, destroying, poisoning, ringbarking, uprooting or burning existing native vegetation in whole or in part.

Existing Native Vegetation (ENV) means areas of indigenous trees (including any sapling) that:

a) had 10% or greater over storey canopy cover present, b) were equal to or greater than 0.5 Ha in area, and

c) were identified as “vegetation” on maps 4 and 5 of the draft Growth Centres Conservation Plan.

DECC means the Department of Environment and Climate Change (which is now the Office of Environment and Heritage).

GCC means the Growth Centres Commission constituted under the Growth Centres (Development Corporations) Act 1974 (which is now Department of Planning and Environment).

Minister means the Minister administering the TSC Act.

Non-certified Area means an area marked as a non-certified area on a biodiversity certification map.

Protection or Protected in relation to land means land that is protected by a land use zoning under an environmental planning instrument or public ownership arrangements that provide for the protection of biodiversity values as a priority, or another arrangement that provides in perpetuity security for biodiversity on the subject land.

Relevant Biodiversity Measures means the conditions in Schedule 1 of the Biodiversity Certification Order.

TSC Act means the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995.

(4)

- Comment 7 of Schedule 7 of the TSC Act General

4 Copies of all final reports, maps, reviews, plans and monitoring data referred to in the conditions of biodiversity certification must be held by the GCC and made publicly available, either on request and/or by a mechanism that is broadly publicly accessible. This does not apply to material that is commercially sensitive or contains sensitive information regarding the location of threatened species, populations or ecological communities or their habitat.

All information required by the RBMs for the

Leppington Precinct will be publicly exhibited.

Yes The following information will be publicly exhibited:

• this report in accordance with RBM 35;

• information required by RBM 8

• information required by RBM 13

Native vegetation to be retained within the Growth Centres

6 A minimum of 2,000 hectares of existing native vegetation must be retained and protected within the Growth Centres, either within the certified areas and/or the non-certified areas, subject to conditions 7 to 13 below.

The draft Conservation Plan identifies 0.0 Ha of ENV to be retained within the Study Area (Stage 1) to maintain parity with the 2000 Ha requirement.

Yes There is no validated ENV as defined under the order to be protected and retained under the Leppington Precinct Plan (Stage 1) (Annex B and C).

Retention of existing native vegetation during precinct planning 7 During the precinct planning process, the GCC may determine to

make areas of existing native vegetation within the non-certified areas available for development if the clearance of such vegetation is considered necessary for either the provision of essential

infrastructure and/or to meet the required Development Parameters specified in the Growth Centres Development Code.

There is no mapped non- certified ENV within Stage 1.

Yes There is no validated non- certified ENV to be lost as part of any planned future

development.

8 In making a determination under condition 7, the GCC must demonstrate by way of information provided during the public exhibition of the precinct plan (where that exhibition occurs after this order takes effect) that the clearing of any existing native

There is no validated non- certified ENV to be lost as part of any planned future development within the

Yes There is no validated ENV as defined under the order to be protected and retained under the Leppington Precinct Plan (Stage

(5)

vegetation in the non-certified areas will be offset by:

(a) the protection of an equal or greater area of existing native vegetation elsewhere in the Growth Centres; and/or

(b) the revegetation and/or restoration of an area of land elsewhere in the Growth Centres, subject to satisfying the following,

(i) that the clearance of existing native vegetation in the non- certified areas will not affect the capacity to achieve overall improvement or maintenance of biodiversity values for threatened species, populations and ecological communities and their habitats,

(ii) the revegetated and/or restored areas will be protected, (iii) the extent of revegetation and/or restoration compared to

clearing of existing native vegetation must be undertaken at a ratio of at least 3:1 (to reflect the greater ecological risks relative to retaining existing native vegetation),

(iv) areas subject to revegetation and/or restoration must be of a suitable boundary configuration and design to support long- term management,

(v) revegetation and/or restoration of the proposed areas would not be undertaken under another scheme or regulatory requirement already in operation at the time that the clearing is approved (this includes but is not limited to any approvals, and associated conditions of such approvals, that may be required under the Rivers and Foreshores Improvement Act 1948 and Water Management Act 2000),

(vi) revegetation and/or restoration will be undertaken by suitably qualified and experienced persons using indigenous plant stock, and

(vii) sufficient resources will be made available to undertake the revegetation and/or restoration and any necessary follow-up maintenance and monitoring for a minimum period of 5 years following the commencement of the revegetation and/or restoration.

Leppington Precinct (Stage 1).

1)

Refer Annex A.

(6)

9 Revegetation and/or restoration may be partly counted towards meeting the overall requirement to protect 2,000 hectares of existing vegetation required in condition 6. The amount that may be counted shall be calculated by dividing the total area of revegetation and/or restoration required under condition 8b (iii) by 3.

Note: for example, if 9 hectares of revegetation is undertaken then 3 hectares may be counted.

Not Applicable

Retention of existing native vegetation shown in areas marked with red hatching

12 Notwithstanding any other conditions of biodiversity certification, in the lands marked by a red hatching on the biodiversity certification maps existing native vegetation must not be cleared unless it is in accordance with a plan of management or unless such clearance has been agreed to by the DECC.

Not Applicable

Ground-truthing of existing native vegetation

13 If new information becomes available after the biodiversity certification order took effect that demonstrates that the vegetation within an area does not otherwise meet the definition of existing native vegetation, then for the purposes of conditions 7 to 8 and condition 11 to 12 only the area of confirmed existing native vegetation shall be considered.

Eco Logical Australia conducted ground-truthing of ENV and AHCVV within the Study Area. The calculations of loss is based on the originally mapped ENV (to maintain comparison with the Precinct target) whilst protection is calculated on field validated ENV (for conditions 7 to 8 and 11 to 12) reflect the updated vegetation mapping.

Yes Further detailed assessment is contained within the Leppington Rezoning Assessment:

Biodiversity and Riparian Studies (Eco Logical Australia 2014).

Annex A shows the results of ground-truthing.

The draft conservation plan maps 10.9 Ha of ENV within the Study Area, all of which lies within certified land areas.

Field Survey validated 8.5 Ha of ENV currently existing

throughout the Study Area all of which lies within certified areas and will not be protected.

(7)

Field survey validated a further 2.3 Ha of Additional High Conservation Value Vegetation (AHCVV) within certified lands which will not be protected.

Additional conservation actions within the Growth Centres – native vegetation

14 During or before the preparation of the relevant precinct plan(s) under the Growth Centres Development Code, a further detailed

assessment must be undertaken of the areas adjoining or proximate to the Shanes Park Air Services Australia site marked in blue hatching on the biodiversity certification maps.

Not Applicable

15 The assessment referred to in condition 14 must examine whether the areas meet the criteria specified in Schedule 3.

Not Applicable

16 Based on the outcomes of the assessment the DECC shall provide advice to the Minister on whether the areas should be included within the certified areas or the non-certified areas shown on the

biodiversity certification maps.

Not Applicable

Additional conservation actions within the Growth Centres – plants 17 During or before the preparation of the relevant precinct plan(s) under

the Growth Centres Development Code relating to the areas referred to in the table below, the following actions must be undertaken:

Not Applicable

Species

Acacia pubescens Required action

Potential populations at Cross Street, Kemps Creek and Thirty- second Avenue, Austral – as shown in black hatching on the biodiversity certification maps:

• survey to confirm the presence of the species, and

if the species is present, provide for the protection of the area of suitable habitat for the species to the satisfaction of the

(8)

DECC.

Pimelea spicata

Potential populations at Denham Court Road - as shown in black hatching on the biodiversity certification maps:

• survey to confirm the presence of species, and

if the species is present, provide for the protection of the area of suitable habitat for the species to the satisfaction of the DECC.

Persoonia hirsuta

Potential populations at North Kellyville – as shown in black hatching on the biodiversity certification maps:

• survey to confirm the presence of the species, and

if the species is present, provide for the protection of the area of suitable habitat for the species to the satisfaction of the DECC.

Leucopogon fletcheri

Known population at North Kellyville - as shown in black hatching on the biodiversity certification maps:

• survey to confirm the extent of the population, and

provide for the protection of the population to the satisfaction of the DECC.

Darwinia biflora Hibbertia superans

Epacris purpurascens var purpurascens Eucalyptus sp “Cattai”

Known populations at North Kellyville - as shown in black hatching on the biodiversity certification maps:

• survey to confirm the extent of the populations, and

provide for the protection of the population to the satisfaction of the DECC.

Note: On completion of the above actions the Minister may decide that it is appropriate to amend the boundaries of the area subject to

(9)

biodiversity certification, in accordance with condition 3.

Additional conservation actions within the Growth Centres – animals 18 During or before the preparation of the relevant precinct plan(s) under

the Growth Centres Development Code relating to the area referred to in the table below, the following actions must be undertaken:

Not Applicable

Species Green and Golden Bell Frog

Required action

Potential population at Riverstone – as shown in black hatching on the biodiversity certification maps:

Option 1

• survey to confirm the presence of the species, and

• if the species is present, provide

protection of the area of suitable habitat for the species to the satisfaction of the DECC.

Option 2

• if the species is present at Riverstone but cannot be adequately protected to the satisfaction of the DECC, then:

a) undertake targeted survey to confirm the presence of the species elsewhere in the Growth Centres, and

b) if the species is present elsewhere in the Growth Centres, provide for the protection of an area(s) of suitable habitat for the species to the satisfaction of the DECC.

Note: On completion of the above actions the Minister may decide that it is appropriate to amend the boundaries of the area subject to biodiversity certification, in accordance with condition 3.

Additional conservation actions within the Growth Centres – development sites

(10)

19 Within twelve months of the biodiversity certification order taking effect, the DP&E (in consultation with the DECCW) must put in place procedures so that all future precinct plans (excluding any plans that were publicly exhibited before the biodiversity certification order took effect), where practicable, provide for the appropriate re-use of:

(a) native plants (including but not limited to seed collection) and the re-location of native animals from development sites, prior to development commencing; and

(b) top soil from development sites that contain known or potential native seed bank.

For the purposes of condition 19a and 19b appropriate uses may include, but are not limited to, application in revegetation or restoration works and landscaping in the Growth Centres.

These provisions have been incorporated into the DCP for the Camden Council Growth Centre Precincts.

Yes Refer to clause 2.3.4 of the Camden Growth Centre Precincts DCP.

Future precinct plans

35 During the preparation of future precinct plans (excluding any precinct plans already publicly exhibited before this order took effect) the GCC must undertake and make publicly available an assessment of the consistency of the proposed precinct plan with the conditions of biodiversity certification. This may occur during or before any public exhibition of future draft precinct plans.

This assessment of consistency has been prepared to satisfy this RBM. This report will be publicly exhibited with the full Precinct Planning package.

Yes This assessment addresses all RBMs applicable to the planning for the Leppington Precinct (Stage 1).

Future threatened species listings or discoveries

36 Where a preliminary determination is made under the Act to list a species, population or ecological community, and that species, population or ecological community may or is known to occur within the Growth Centres, then the Growth Centres Commission must (as soon as practicable) provide advice to the DECC on whether:

(a) the species, population or ecological community is known or likely to be present in the Growth Centres;

(b) it was considered during the preparation of the draft Growth Centres Conservation Plan by the GCC; and

Not Applicable

(11)

(c) whether the SEPP, and related measures, provides adequate protection for the species, population or ecological community.

37 Based on the information provided in accordance with condition 36, and any other relevant matters, the DECC shall advise the Minister on whether to formally review, maintain, modify, suspend or revoke the biodiversity certification of the SEPP if the species, population or ecological community is listed under the Act.

Yes

(12)

It is concluded that the Leppington Precinct Area planning is consistent with the biodiversity certification of the Growth Centres SEPP, as follows:

• The Precinct Plan (Stage 1) will protect 0 Ha of field validated ENV.

• There is to be no loss of validated non-certified ENV due to there not being any existing non-certified ENV within Stage 1.

• No AHCVV will be protected within Stage 1.

The SEPP amendment will provide a clause that prevents the clearing of ENV in certain areas (principally in the proposed non-certified land) as shown on the Native Vegetation Protection Map (Annex C).

Proposed biodiversity certification map

To reflect the outcomes of the Precinct Plan and ensure the protection of ENV, amendments are proposed to the boundaries of certified and non-

certified land as shown on the biodiversity certification map (see Annex D).

(13)

Annex A

Biodiversity Certification Map for Leppington Precinct

(including field validation results)

(14)

Stage 1

(15)

Stage 1

AHCVV on Certified Land in Stage 1 = 2.25ha

AHCVV on Certified Land in Leppington Precinct = 5.1ha

(16)

(Stage 1)

Results of field validation for Existing Native Vegetation & AHCVV (Stage 1)

Reference Item Area (ha)

A Area of mapped ENV in non-certified areas (as per Conservation Plan)

0

B Area of validated ENV in non-certified areas 0

C Area of validated ENV in certified areas (Stage 1) 8.5

D Total area of validated ENV in Stage 1 8.5

E Total area of validated AHCVV in Stage 1 2.3

Summary of impacts, offsets and areas of ENV to be protected (Stage 1)

Reference Item Area (ha)

A Area of mapped ENV in non-certified areas (as per Conservation Plan) in Stage 1

0

B Area of validated ENV in non-certified areas 0

C Impacts: Validated non-certified ENV to be cleared (area to become certified)

0

D Offsets: Validated certified ENV to be used as offset (area to become non-certified)

0

E Total area of ENV to be protected in non-certified areas (E

= B-C+D)

0

F Area of additional high conservation value vegetation (AHCVV) to be protected

0

H Total area of ENV/AHCVV to be protected (H = F+G) 0

(17)

Annex B

Final Indicative Layout Plan for Leppington Precinct (Stage 1)

(18)
(19)

Annex C

Proposed Protection Measures for Leppington Priority Precinct (Stage 1)

(including Native Vegetation Protection Map and Zoning Plan)

(20)
(21)
(22)

Annex D

Proposed Amendments to Biodiversity Certification Map

(23)

Land Type Stage 1 Current Area (Ha) Stage 1 Proposed Area (Ha)

Certified Land 179.01 172.24

Non Certified Land 0 6.77

(24)

References

Related documents

The majority of private land in the MRA is peri-urban land located outside of rural villages.. The primary determinant of the market value of peri-urban lands is likely to

Where the report indicates that precinct planning is inconsistent with the biodiversity certification, full justification for the inconsistency is provided as part of the

Terms defined below appear in bold in the table. Where the terms are also defined in the Biodiversity Certification Order, the definitions provided are consistent with those in

provided as part of the ecological assessment for the precinct... Assessment of consistency between Relevant Biodiversity Measures of the Biodiversity Certification

c) were identified as ―vegetation‖ on maps 4 and 5 of the draft Growth Centres Conservation Plan, at the time the biodiversity certification order took effect, subject to RBM 13.

The total ABC contribution to Australian screen drama, combined with approximately $125 million in external funding, delivered up to $244 million in production value to

Relative contributions of individual rivers to the COTS initiation region between Cairns and Lizard Island were calculated based on the total cumulative exposure index, aggregated

The real part of ζ(s), when averaged in a modified manner, for fixed values of σ over the values on the “Gram lines”, satisfies a relation which extends a theorem of Titchmarsh,

Sessional Com m ittee on the Environm ent 79.. A strong research and development effort, particularly into the integration of control methods, is essential to the

(Refer to Annex C which highlights areas of CPW in non-.. which provides funding to acquire the land. c) 280 ha to be protected within existing reserved areas including

Q21: Using contiguous allocation for files if empty disk space is maintained in a linked list with random ordering, which of the following algorithms would be fastest to

Biodiversity value of native vegetation –Values of native vegetation considered in the Guidelines that relate to biodiversity including extent of native vegetation, large

Ms LAWRIE (Leader of Government Business): Madam Speaker, I move – That, the Assembly refer the following matters to the Standing Orders Committee for inquiry and report to

In my opinion the financial report gives a true and fair view of the financial position of the Surveyors Board of the Northern Territory of Australia as at 30 June 2016, and of

Benzene (ppb) change in annual max 1-hour (MDA1) ground level concentrations from Scenario 2 due to future industry (S3-S2) for a subset of the CAMx 1.33 km domain centred over

These changes impacted on the existing native vegetation (ENV) being protected in the precinct. This final consistency report addresses the whole precinct and presents the

A complete copy of the biodiversity certification order (including all relevant biodiversity measures) can be found on the former Department of Environment, Climate Change and

Where the report indicates that precinct planning is inconsistent with the biodiversity certification, full justification for the inconsistency is provided as part of the

Terms defined below appear in bold in the table. Where the terms are also defined in the Biodiversity Certification Order, the definitions provided are consistent with those in

The Environmental Protection (Clearing of Native Vegetation) Regulations 2004 established under the Environmental Protection Act 1986 provides for the protection of all

existence. In making such an estimate, the Government Printer was requested to take as understood that each author body would have its report printed by the

disadvantage have special resonance for the Australian Aboriginal community, where the construct, the best interests of the child, has been applied and has resulted in an

The Swedish school authorities have drawn attention to this work and designated the school ‘the best school in Sweden working for equal value 2008’. Student empowerment, child’s